Learn without guessing
Rules, scanning, candidates, and a dependable first solving method.
Original ideas for clearer play
A record of how Sudoku is solved, taught, and shaped. The Journal turns interesting games into substantial original lessons — giving players something useful to read before the next puzzle.
Su-Pu Studies
What happens when your chosen candidate turns out to be correct? A look at the ibtree method's success path—and a practical verification technique for any completed grid.
When three candidates compete for the same digit, a two-layer ibtree resolves the uncertainty—eliminating two false paths to prove the third.
When a Hell-tier puzzle’s elegant initial state meets the ibtree method’s sharp forks, even a Hodoku 7820 becomes a study in creative leverage.
When candidate reduction demands a dozen advanced techniques, ibtree finds an elegant path through a single well-chosen assumption.
When three candidates vie for one position, treat it as two binary decisions—and watch a Hell-tier puzzle collapse.
When two candidates in a box form a knight's-move pattern, one often acts as a chain trigger—tracing it forward quickly reveals which assumption leads to contradiction.
When basic methods stall, look for a binary fork—two candidates in one box—and trace one forward to find your proof by contradiction.
Puzzle Challenge
Submit a Sudoku you couldn't crack — your own or one you found elsewhere. If it checks out, we'll solve it, reconstruct the study, and publish it here with your credit (or anonymously, your call).
Submit a puzzle →Rules, scanning, candidates, and a dependable first solving method.
Formal patterns explained through real positions and useful eliminations.
Logical flow, validation, turning points, and thoughtful difficulty.
How the Journal is made
Choose and verify a noteworthy solve.
Rebuild the Su-Pu and draft the lesson.
Check the logic against the playable position.
Release, link practice, and correct openly.