Skip to main content
谱 Su-Pu Studies · Lesson 06

Three-Way Fork in Box 9: A Double Contradiction

When three candidates compete for the same digit, a two-layer ibtree resolves the uncertainty—eliminating two false paths to prove the third.

Written by the Orbace Sudoku Editorial Team · August 2, 2026 · 8 min read · Download PDF
Su-Pu Studies Extreme Hell-tier Ibtree Proof by Contradiction Three-Way Fork

In this study

  1. Backstory
  2. Setup
  3. First test
  4. Second test
  5. Resolution
  6. Finish
  7. Tree view

01 · Backstory

A summer camp puzzle that stumped the experts

A single mother sent her son to a summer camp where there was a sudoku class. One day the boy was struggling with a very hard puzzle. The mother posted the problem online, and lots of people replied that the solution was very hard to explain.

The starting grid: a Hell-tier extreme puzzle with scattered givens
The puzzle that stumped the class—rated Hell (level 9), hodoku value 2240, SE rating 7.0.

Indeed, this is an extreme sudoku puzzle rated as "Hell" (level 9), with a hodoku value of 2240 and an SE rating of 7.0. It may not be as hard as the one presented in lesson 5, but following the canred method and applying several advanced techniques to solve it would cause experienced sudoku players to scratch their heads, let alone a young learner.

But take a close look at the features and positions of digit 7. We could have better ideas with the ibtree method.

02 · Setup

Low-hanging fruit in Box 4

Before we identify the right chain trigger, let's use basic cross-hatching to get some low-hanging fruit. As expected, we can get three digits and a naked pair to complete Box 4, which are of great help down the line.

After cross-hatching: Box 4 is nearly complete, and three possible homes for 7 appear in Box 9
After simple cross-hatching, Box 4 fills in and three candidates for 7 emerge in Box 9.

We notice that there are three possible homes for digit 7 in Box 9, all of them capable of causing a long chain of reactions. As we explained in lesson 3, a three-way fork can be conceptually re-structured as two layers of a binary decision tree.

03 · First test

Testing the R8C8 candidate

Let's first test the assumption that 7 belongs in R8C8.

Testing 7 in R8C8
Step 1Assume 7 in R8C8 and trace the forced placements.

After a quick tracing around the board, we find that there is no room for 7 in Box 6.

No valid placement for 7 in Box 6 after assuming R8C8
Step 2Contradiction: no valid home for 7 remains in Box 6.

This is our first proof by contradiction. The assumption that 7 belongs in R8C8 is false.

04 · Second test

Testing the R8C9 candidate

Similarly, we can test the assumption that 7 belongs in R8C9.

Testing 7 in R8C9
Step 1Assume 7 in R8C9 and trace the forced chain.

This time it takes a few extra steps with digit 3, but again there is another contradiction: there is no room for 5 in Box 1.

No valid placement for 5 in Box 1 after assuming R8C9
Step 4Contradiction: no valid home for 5 remains in Box 1.

This is our second proof by contradiction. The assumption that 7 belongs in R8C9 is also false.

05 · Resolution

The only remaining candidate

Combining these two separate tests, we know for certain that in Box 9, 7 must be in R7C8.

7 confirmed in R7C8 after eliminating the other two candidates
The certain placement: 7 in R7C8, proved by eliminating both alternative candidates.

The Orbace rule for three-way forks: When three candidates compete for the same digit in a box, test two of them with separate ibtree chains. If both lead to contradictions, the third candidate is certain—no further proof required.

06 · Finish

Straightforward to the end

Once we have this critical determination, the rest of the solving is straightforward.

The completed grid
The completed puzzle—solved in under ten minutes, thanks to the double-contradiction technique.

Had the poor boy learned the ibtree method, he would have saved a lot of struggling time and enjoyed his sudoku play.

07 · Tree view

The two-layer binary tree

The diagram below shows the complete inferential structure of this solve: a root fork splitting into two branches, each traced to its own contradiction, leaving the third candidate as the only valid path.

Box 9 · digit 7 Three candidates: R7C8, R8C8, R8C9 test R8C8 test R8C9 Assume 7 in R8C8 Trace forced placements... Contradiction No valid home for 7 in Box 6 Assume 7 in R8C9 Trace through digit 3... Contradiction No valid home for 5 in Box 1 both false → third certain Certain placement 7 in R7C8 Grid unlocked Solve continues straightforwardly

Try it in your next puzzle

The next time you encounter a three-way fork, test two candidates with separate chains. If both fail, you've proved the third—no guesswork, no advanced canred techniques, just clear logic.

Start a Tea Moment

Reconstructed from a real personal Su-Pu replay and checked against the recorded grid. Spotted a step that doesn't hold up? Tell us—every Journal article carries an accountable byline and an open correction channel.